Introduction
The Israel-Gaza conflict, intensified by Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, remains a deeply polarising global issue. By August 2025, the war has persisted for nearly two years, devastating Gaza’s 2.3 million residents and exposing Israeli civilians to ongoing militant threats. Israeli forces aim to dismantle Hamas’s infrastructure, while Palestinian groups, including Hamas, launch rockets and engage in guerrilla warfare. Competing narratives dominate: Israeli officials and supporters assert compliance with international law, minimal civilian harm and robust humanitarian aid efforts, while UN agencies, human rights organisations, and journalists report widespread famine, attacks on protected sites, and disproportionate civilian casualties.
This essay examines four claims often attributed to Israeli officials or advocates, contrasting them with evidence from international organisations, media, and investigations. The goal is to clarify facts amid the “fog of war,” not to take sides. Sources include UN reports, WHO assessments, BBC Verify, Reuters, AP News, NPR, Al Jazeera, PBS, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, The New York Times and The Times of Israel. The term “Zionist Alternative Facts” reflects debates over misinformation, where narratives tied to Zionism, supporting Jewish self-determination, or critiques of it as a pretext for oppression can obscure realities. This analysis avoids ideological framing, focusing on verifiable data.
Gaza faces a humanitarian catastrophe, with over 60,000 Palestinian deaths reported, mostly women and children, and Israel reports eliminating thousands of militants alongside losses from October 7, including 1,200 civilians. Humanitarian access is contentious, with Israel accusing Hamas of aid theft and aid groups blaming Israeli restrictions for famine. UN leaders describe Gaza’s crisis as a “failure of humanity,” while Israeli officials emphasise self-defence against existential threats. These tensions frame the analysis of four claims: food abundance, hospital targeting, civilian casualties and aid convoy attacks. Each section probes discrepancies, concluding with reflections on accountability and peace.
Claim 1: “There is Plenty of Food in Gaza”
Israeli officials frequently assert that Gaza has sufficient food, attributing shortages to Hamas’s mismanagement or theft. In July 2025, leaders claimed over 28,000 trucks delivered nearly 500,000 tons of food since January 2024. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed starvation reports as “Hamas disinformation,” highlighting aid corridors and airdrops. Supporters cite initiatives like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which distributed millions of meals in militarised zones. The narrative portrays Israel as enabling daily aid, food, water, medicine, while blaming UN agencies for distribution failures.
Evidence paints a starkly different picture: a human-made famine affecting over half a million people. On August 22, 2025, the World Health Organisation confirmed famine in Gaza, citing widespread starvation, destitution and preventable deaths. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, an UN-backed body, declared famine in Gaza Governorate, including Gaza City, projecting its spread across the Strip by September. This assessment, based on July-September 2025 data, shows catastrophic conditions after 22 months of conflict, with over 640,000 people at famine levels. UN leaders called it a “man-made disaster,” pointing to Israeli restrictions as a key driver.
Aid agencies report that border closures and military operations severely limit access. In August 2025, the UN warned of a “descent into massive famine” amid intensified operations in Gaza City. Al Jazeera documented 10 hunger-related deaths in late August, with experts labelling the crisis “man-made” due to sieges and infrastructure destruction. UNICEF noted famine thresholds exceeded, with children dying from malnutrition without underlying conditions. Hospitals reported eight starvation deaths in early August, including healthy children.
Israel has rejected these findings, dismissing UN reports as lies and accusing Hamas of diverting aid. A US analysis in July 2025 found no evidence of massive theft, noting only isolated incidents. Researchers documented Israeli attacks on food warehouses, bakeries, and agricultural sites since October 2023, worsening the famine. Reports describe desperate scenes: crowds fired upon while seeking aid, with over 1,000 killed since May 2025. The World Food Programme’s leader described “dire conditions” in August, calling for a surge in aid. Israel facilitated some efforts, like airdropping 131 tons of supplies in one day, but these are insufficient amid blockades.
The UN and Israel trade blame, with the UN citing security breakdowns and Israel pointing to Hamas. This claim of food abundance ignores systemic barriers, with restrictions and attacks driving the crisis. As famine spreads, urgent ceasefire and unimpeded aid access are critical, per UN experts.
The discrepancy between the claim and reality is stark. While Israel insists aid volumes are sufficient, the destruction of Gaza’s agricultural infrastructure, fields, greenhouses and markets, combined with restricted border crossings, has crippled food availability. Families resort to eating leaves or animal feed, and malnutrition-related diseases are rampant. The blockade, tightened since October 2023, limits not only food but also fuel and medical supplies, hampering aid distribution. Even when trucks enter, checkpoints and ongoing bombardments disrupt delivery to those in need. The famine’s toll is evident in rising child mortality and emaciated populations, contradicting assertions of “plenty.” This gap underscores the need for transparent aid monitoring and international intervention to avert further catastrophe. Historical parallels, such as famines in Yemen or Ethiopia, highlight how sieges exacerbate food insecurity, yet Gaza’s crisis is uniquely acute due to its density and enclosure. Calls from global leaders for a humanitarian truce emphasise that without political will, technical aid solutions fall short.
To deepen the analysis, consider the economic dimensions: Gaza’s pre-war economy was fragile, reliant on aid and limited trade. The conflict has destroyed 80% of farmland and fisheries, per reports, making self-sufficiency impossible. Israeli approvals for aid entry fluctuate, with denials for “dual-use” items like batteries complicating logistics. While some markets in southern Gaza show food availability at inflated prices, northern areas are cut off, leading to stark disparities. Personal accounts from residents describe skipping meals and foraging, aligning with UN data on acute malnutrition affecting 30% of children under two. The claim’s persistence may stem from selective data presentation, focusing on entry points rather than end-user access. Ultimately, resolving this requires not just more aid but addressing root causes like infrastructure repair and ceasefire agreements.
Claim 2: “We Don’t Deliberately Target Hospitals”
Israeli officials maintain that their military does not intentionally target hospitals, asserting that strikes aim at Hamas militants using medical facilities as shields. In the August 25, 2025, attack on Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza, the Israeli Defence Forces claimed they targeted a Hamas surveillance camera, not the hospital, and denied targeting journalists or civilians. The IDF said six terrorists were killed, rejecting accusations of deliberate harm. Broader statements emphasise warnings to hospitals, like instructions to Gaza City facilities to prepare for evacuations in August 2025. Israel argues that Hamas’s embedding in civilian infrastructure justifies such actions under international law, with hundreds of reported health care attacks attributed to militant presence.
Reality shows repeated strikes on medical facilities, raising questions about intent and proportionality. The Nasser Hospital attack killed at least 20 people, including five journalists and health workers, in a “double-tap” strike—hitting the same site twice, potentially targeting rescuers. BBC Verify confirmed four strikes, not the two Israel initially reported, using video footage showing back-to-back hits. Reuters and Arab News reported 20 deaths, with Hamas stating no militants were among the victims. The UN condemned the strikes as shocking, noting journalists were killed outside the hospital gate.
This incident fits a pattern: Israel has attacked hospitals multiple times over 22 months, claiming Hamas embeds there, but such actions risk violating international humanitarian law without clear military necessity. UN experts in August 2025 decried “relentless” attacks on Gaza’s healthcare system, labelling it “medicide,” with 33 of 36 hospitals bombed. Doctors Without Borders denounced the Nasser strike, which injured 50 and damaged the facility, already strained by restrictions.
Israeli investigations often conclude no wrongdoing, but independent analyses suggest otherwise. The double-tap strike could constitute a war crime, as it endangers rescuers and civilians. Widespread outrage followed, with the attack suggesting deliberate targeting of protected persons. Five journalists, including one from Al Jazeera, were among the dead. The WHO reported critical supplies running out amid rising rare syndromes in Gaza. Strikes on other hospitals, like Al Shifa in August, killed journalists.
Israel maintains these are precision operations against threats, but multiple hits on the same site undermine claims of non-deliberate targeting. This gap between claim and reality fuels global condemnation and questions compliance with laws protecting medical sites.
Expanding on this, the pattern of hospital strikes began early in the conflict, with Al Shifa Hospital raided in November 2023 amid claims of a Hamas command centre beneath it. While Israel released videos showing weapons caches, international observers noted insufficient evidence for the scale of the operation, which left the hospital inoperable. Subsequent attacks on facilities like Al Aqsa and Indonesian Hospitals followed similar justifications, but reports indicate minimal militant activity in many cases. The cumulative effect has decimated Gaza’s health system, with only partial functionality restored through temporary field hospitals.
Legal experts argue that even if militants are present, hospitals retain protection unless they lose civilian status, and attacks must be proportionate. The high number of health worker deaths, over 500, suggests a broader impact on medical neutrality. Personal testimonies from doctors describe operating without anaesthesia or electricity, exacerbating patient suffering. The claim’s defence relies on classified intelligence, but transparency is limited, leading to calls for International Criminal Court probes. In contrast, Hamas’s use of tunnels near hospitals complicates matters, but does not absolve attackers of responsibility under Geneva Conventions. Resolving this requires independent verifications and mechanisms to safeguard medical sites in future conflicts.
Claim 3: “We Don’t Deliberately Target Civilians”
Israeli doctrine emphasises minimising civilian harm, with the IDF claiming warnings, precision strikes, and humanitarian pauses. In 2025, officials reiterated that operations target militants, with civilian casualties regrettable but not intentional. Techniques like “roof knocking” and evacuations aim to reduce risks, with Israel blaming Hamas’s human shield tactics for civilian deaths. A foreign policy advisor stated Israel works hard to keep harm minimal, rejecting genocide accusations as “outrageous” and emphasising self-defence post-October 7.
International bodies, however, document indiscriminate attacks. Human Rights Watch’s 2025 report details Israeli forces killing, wounding, and displacing thousands of civilians, destroying homes in violation of law. A UN Special Committee found warfare methods consistent with genocide characteristics, including mass casualties. Amnesty International highlighted failures to minimise harm in strikes on armed groups. The New York Times revealed loosened bombing rules, endangering civilians.
UN data shows nearly 70% of verified fatalities are women and children, with over 50,000 total deaths likely underreported. Human Rights Watch reported violations post-October 7, including strikes on schools sheltering civilians. Leaked Israeli data from August 2025 indicated an 83% civilian death rate, among the highest in modern wars. Some question this toll, noting polarised reactions.
UN experts in May 2025 warned of an “unfolding genocide,” urging action. Israeli human rights groups, in a rare move, accused Israel of genocide in July. Over 1,000 aid-seekers, plus many children, journalists (over 100 killed), and health workers, have died. While Israel claims proportionality, evidence of excessive destruction raises serious legal questions.
Delving deeper, the shift in bombing protocols reportedly allowed for higher collateral damage thresholds, from 20 to 100 civilians per militant target in some cases. This policy change, justified by the need to neutralise Hamas quickly, has led to entire neighbourhoods levelled, displacing 90% of Gaza’s population. Schools, used as shelters, have been hit repeatedly, killing hundreds. The UN’s documentation of “domicide”, systematic home destruction, suggests intent to render areas uninhabitable.
Critics point to statements from Israeli officials early in the war calling for Gaza’s erasure, fuelling genocide allegations at the International Court of Justice. Israel counters with investigations into individual incidents, disciplining soldiers in rare cases, but systemic patterns persist. Civilian testimonies describe unannounced strikes and forced marches south, only to face dangers there too. The high journalist toll raises press freedom concerns, with accusations of targeted killings. Balancing self-defence with humanitarian law is complex, but the scale of casualties, exceeding those in Ukraine’s urban battles, demands scrutiny. Peace proposals, like those from Qatar-mediated talks, emphasise civilian protection as a prerequisite.
Claim 4: “Food Aid Convoy Attacked = Hamas Did It”
Israel often blames Hamas for aid convoy attacks, alleging theft to fund fighters. In 2025, the IDF claimed UN agencies enabled Hamas hijacking, with up to 25% of aid diverted, citing gangs hoarding amid security breakdowns.
Investigations point to Israeli forces. In April 2024, a World Central Kitchen convoy was struck by Israeli drones, killing seven workers; Israel admitted a “mistake.” Over 1,000 aid-seekers were killed by Israeli fire since May 2025, per reports. US reviews found no evidence of massive theft, only isolated incidents. NPR noted unproven accusations against Hamas. The World Food Programme condemned Israeli fire on crowds.
Human Rights Watch documented attacks on known aid sites, like World Central Kitchen vehicles hit multiple times. In November 2024, another strike killed three workers. While some diversion occurs, widespread blame on Hamas lacks substantiation, per UNRWA. This highlights unsubstantiated claims against evidence of Israeli involvement.
Further examination reveals a pattern of aid disruptions, including the February 2024 “flour massacre,” where over 100 Palestinians died seeking food, with forensics indicating Israeli gunfire. Israel’s initial blame on Hamas stampedes was revised after evidence. Coordination failures, despite deconfliction systems, persist, with aid groups suspending operations after strikes. The claim serves to deflect responsibility, but internal Israeli reviews admit errors in targeting. Aid workers’ deaths, over 200, underscore risks, prompting calls for arms embargoes. Resolving this requires secure corridors and accountability, as famine worsens without safe delivery.
Conclusion
These discrepancies between Israeli claims and evidence from UN agencies, human rights groups and media underscore the need for independent investigations. Famine, hospital strikes, civilian deaths, and aid convoy attacks reveal a gap between rhetoric and reality. UN calls for ceasefires intensify as civilian suffering mounts, with genocide accusations from experts and groups. Sources from UN, WHO, BBC, Reuters, AP, NPR, Al Jazeera, PBS, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty, The New York Times, and Israeli outlets provide a balanced view. Facts must guide accountability and peace efforts to end this crisis.
