The red-haired fishmonger.

— – —

© Bakchos 2026

This Post Has 11 Comments

  1. Jen

    Written in a style that feels post-2016 / post-2024, the fable captures the real-world dynamic of culture-war populism being used (or perceived to be used) as a shield for continued fossil-fuel dependence and delayed climate action. The “sideways hatred” vs “upward clarity” framing is a direct response to the observed correlation between heightened political tribalism and stalled environmental policy in many Western democracies.

  2. Kelly Conrad

    Bakchos has written a 21st-century Aesopian fable that is both beautifully crafted and politically incendiary. It rewards multiple readings — first for the story, second for the allegory, third for the quiet sorrow beneath the critique. The river is already thinning; the question the fable leaves us with is whether we will keep looking sideways until it is gone.

  3. Aurora

    A red-haired fishmonger in a remote valley begins spreading whispers of fear and suspicion about neighbouring villages. Her small resentments are noticed by a powerful billionaire from the West, who offers her wealth, a private flying machine, and access to the “Orange King of the North.” The fishmonger becomes a travelling agitator, amplifying division on a massive scale. While ordinary people focus on hating their neighbours, the natural world (the river, the fish, the bees, the seasons) quietly collapses. In the end, both the tool (fishmonger) and the user (billionaire) confront the consequences of the world they helped unmake.

  4. Polina Ivanov

    The fable is unusually transparent in its symbolism, which is part of its power:
    • The Red-Haired Fishmonger?Symbolises the authentic-seeming populist agitator — the local voice who genuinely believes her grievances. She is not a cartoon villain; she starts from real, modest resentments (“narrow field,” inherited cart, “hunger… to be better than”). Her red hair and fish-cart represent grounded, working-class authenticity. She is dangerous precisely because she is not a paid actor — she believes what she says, making her the perfect instrument.
    • The Billionaire from the West?Represents global elite interests (fossil-fuel, extraction, or finance capital) who fund and amplify division. Her grey, seamless clothing and “cold and mineral” perfume symbolise detached, calculating wealth. She doesn’t hate anyone; she simply needs people distracted so they never look “upward” at the real threat to her empire.
    • The Orange King of the North?An unmistakable stand-in for Donald Trump (orange complexion, boastful “digging”/extraction, multiple marriages, theatrical rallies, constant lying presented as strength, “valour performed from the chest”). He is the loud, charismatic front-man who channels the fishmonger’s whispers into mass politics.
    • The River, Fish, Bees, Seasons?Direct symbols of the natural world under climate stress. The river’s gradual thinning and final disappearance is Mother Gaia’s “withdrawal” — not dramatic apocalypse, but slow, inexorable ecological collapse. The silent bees are the “canary in the coal mine” (explicitly referenced).
    • The Silver Flying Machine & Magic Coins?Private jets, sudden wealth, and media amplification — the tools that turn local resentment into national (or global) political force.

  5. Bill Wheatley

    Whether one accepts the fable’s causal chain (billionaires deliberately engineering division primarily to protect carbon interests) is a matter of political interpretation. What is undeniable is that the story diagnoses a real pattern: polarisation reduces collective problem-solving capacity, and environmental indicators (rivers, pollinators, seasons) continue their quiet decline regardless of who is shouting loudest on the stage.

  6. Gertie

    Well kumpel, I don’t know these people, apart from the obvious reference to Trump, but if they recognise themselves they won’t be happy.

  7. Andy

    The red headed fishmonger is an imbecile.

  8. Mirko

    This is a modern political-environmental allegory written in the classical fable tradition (think Aesop or Orwell’s Animal Farm, but with lyrical prose and nine numbered sections). It uses a simple village setting to deliver a sharp, layered critique of division, populism, elite manipulation, and climate inaction. The tone is melancholy and ironic rather than preachy; the moral emerges slowly through the characters’ self-inflicted downfall rather than a tacked-on moral at the end.

  9. Amanda Desilver

    When ordinary people are kept busy fearing one another, they will not notice — or act on — the forces actually destroying the world they live in. Elites who benefit from extraction and pollution have a material interest in cultivating that distraction. In the end, no one (not the populist, not the billionaire, not the king) escapes the consequences of a dying planet.

  10. Lady Margaret

    Mark this is clearly your very own 21st-century Aesopian fable.

  11. Paulo

    Great takedown of the Ginger Whinger.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.